Then go download some porn or some video games in the meantime.

Good god, you people need to chill the fuck out.

It's gonna take a while to get it finished.

reCAPTCHA. I'm lazy.

Okay, I think I have a good picture of how the new KR is going to work. I'll get started on it ASAP.

If I do anything, I'm starting from scratch. It'll take longer, but it will be for the best.

Dark Dominion means nothing to anyone who's been on the internet after 2003.

Although I am quick to admit I'm disappointed that Kavoxx's attempts at reviving the site as Dev Empire (and later Dev Console) were unsuccessful.

KR will still have RPG Maker stuff if we act on my vague idea.

I just need user input to help decide what else you guys are interested in.

Be that as it may, it's kinda wasteful to keep paying for a domain name every year that I'm not using but can't get rid of because of how my host is set up. (At least, I don't think I can.)

Honestly, I would prefer to aggregate all ideas and suggestions into one topic so I can read it in one go. The more the merrier. I don't care if this becomes a 200 page thread; I will read every damn page before I make a decision.

And that way, I definitely won't miss anything.

I haven't made any official decisions yet as I'd rather shape it based on what other people think it should be, but if it helps your input I was thinking of something more general than RPG making. Just a general "project" website.

Damn, that's a pretty good CBS.

Call Event is your friend if you want to do anything special.

Okay, so I've been really neglecting Kobra's Realm for way too long. Some things have changed (namely, I no longer have the time or passion for making RPGs) and I've tried to leave Kobra's Realm up for everyone else's convenience. But lately, the majority of the posts are by spam bots.

I think it's high time I did something else with Kobra's Realm, and delegate the RPG making stuff to a subsection of a new website. The current forums would be preserved as read-only and everything in the new site would be coded by yours truly.

But as it is often wise to look before you leap, I must ask: What do you, the users of Kobra's Realm, want?

Resources since last news post
707. Generic Ugly Monster (by: EyesoreII)

The owner of the site (which is me) decided to neglect it for about two years. That's what happened to this place.

Why in the hell was this topic locked?

NEW: If your "profile" field is all lowercase, it will flag your account as spam when you try to register. Also, if you just enter a country name (like Uganda or United Arab Emirates) it will flag you as a bot.

Who the hell is Lemur's brother anyway?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_I_of_En...l_relationships

King James had same-sex relationships, and some of his subjects detested his gayness. His subjects translated the Bible. Ergo, the reason that the English version mentions same-sex relationships (ambiguously) where the Greek and Latin versions do not is that his subjects who translated the Bible put their own opinion in the translation.

As for where the sentiment comes from, I think it has to do with this kind of reasoning:

1. That man over there is attracted to men.
2. I am a man.
3. Therefore, he is attracted to me.

Fallacy of division. But from that stems this:

4. If I let him feel too comfortable around me, he will come onto me.
5. I am not attracted to men.
6. If he comes onto me, I will feel uncomfortable.
7. Therefore, he will come onto me and make me feel uncomfortable if I don't make him feel uncomfortable first.
8. My religion says something negative about homosexual relationships, I think.
9. Therefore, gays are immoral.

Lemur, if you want your viewpoint to be understood, please explain it in secular terms without resorting to fallacies. A sound argument, please. Let's see what you have.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deductive_argument
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Validity
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soundness

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slop...lope_as_fallacy

"This form of argument often provides evaluative judgments on social change: once an exception is made to some rule, nothing will hold back further, more egregious exceptions to that rule."

Otherwise, please concede that your viewpoint is nothing more than opinion and PLEASE STOP EXPRESSING THEM IN FALLACIES.

Because heterosexual couples are allowed to have marriages, homosexual couples should also be allowed to have marriages. Unless you can provide a sound reason why they should not, the simple concept of fair treatment answers your question.

What benefit is it to society for people who are physiologically inclined to love people that some other people don't agree with to be subjugated and discriminated against? Riddle me this.

Let's not forget Matthew Shepard either.

Lemur, nobody is saying you have to suck their dicks to be tolerant. However, you cannot claim to have ANY FRIENDSHIP with ANYONE in which you condemn their happiness. It's a total cognitive dissonance and it just doesn't qualify as friendship.

The problem on both sides is that people are quick to point out the flaws in others to distract the world from their own flaws. Especially the flaws of their own arguments.

Your claim that there was a "democratic congress" for the past 2 years is false. Acknowledge this, please, so we can move on.

Once you have done so, if you have found a problem with anything I've claimed (which would be odd, since I don't recall making that many claims on the forums), I'll acknowledge or dispute anything that is found to be erroneous.

EDIT:



No, you're absolutely wrong because the facts upon which your arguments rely are false.

Bullshit. It's not POSSIBLE to be more annoying than twilight fans. Also, you are stereotyping a diverse cross-section of the population.

If you keep being an ignorant fuckwit, I'm tempted to remove your mod privileges.



What "democratic congress" are you referring to? Bychance do you mean the 49/49/2 Democrat/Republican/Independent senate split? And the Senate really is what matters the most in terms of Congress. The democrats did not have 2/3 majority in the house, so they would need to have had a significant (at least 5 seats) increase over the republicans in the senate in order for the phrase "democratic congress" to be entirely relevant.

Sidenote: YES! That means even if I've said "No" in the past, if you're still interested in affiliating, email me.

I pruned our list of affiliates and found only FOUR of them are still alive (and one of those four, RPG RPG Revolution, was at a new address). This is simply unacceptable.

So it is with a sigh of "Hey, we're not the only people doing RPG Maker any more!" that I introduce you all to Kobra's Realm's newest affiliate: PICCETA.

If there are any other webmasters of RPG Maker communities reading this, and you're interested in affiliating with Kobra's Realm, send me an email at kobrasrealm@gmail.com. (I'm not worried about spam.)

Resources since last news post
702. Ballythings (by: hawkeye)
703. BirdAttack (by: hawkeye)
704. Karate Guy (by: hydro_thunder_92)
705. Joker (by: EyesoreII)

Literaries since last news post
208. MadWorld Game Review (by: hydro_thunder_92)
209. Tool: Lateralus Album Review (by: hydro_thunder_92)

Game Reviews since last news post
48. Game #27 (reviewed by: hawkeye)